Vintage Tastings

By John Kapon

Experience the finest and rarest wines in the world through the eyes and palate of Acker Chairman and globally renowned master taster, John Kapon (our “JK”). “Vintage Tastings” is a written journal chronicling the incredible bottles opened at some of the most exclusive tastings, wine dinners, and events all over the globe. These entries represent JK’s commitment to capturing and sharing the ephemeral nature and ultimate privilege of tasting the world’s rarest wines. Although ratings are based on a 100-point scale, JK believes there is no such thing as a 100-point wine. Point scores assigned to each wine are his own personal attempt to quantify the quality of each experience.

La Paulee 2016

This year’s La Paulee was in San Francisco, and on the Friday night before the big gala, a few lucky gentlemen were invited to dinner at Quince, thanks to the efforts of Tom Terrific and Dapper Dave. Magnums were the theme, and Burgundy was the given. There weren’t too many wines to forgive, as almost everything showed spectacularly. Accordingly, this was an evening no one would forget.

We started with a 1992 Dauvissat Chablis Preuses, and it was it singing. It had a gorgeous nose full of rainwater and yeasty yellow fruit. This was a gamy wine, with aromas of oyster shells, minerals and sun-dried citrus. There was a lot going on, and Dapper Dave commented how this was ‘as good an aged Dauvissat as you can ask for.’ Balanced, delicious, rich and decadent, it sure was (95M).

The 1993 Carillon Bienvenues Batard Montrachet was the only bottle that was slightly off. It was smoky, with white glassy fruit. While smooth and satiny at first, it started to crack up in the glass, as its diamond qualities became zirconia rather quickly, and oxidation emerged (92A-M).

A 1995 Domaine Leflaive Chevalier Montrachet proudly carried the flag for Anne-Claude, who passed away earlier this year. Deep orange and rust penetrated the nose, along with heavy cream and more orange peel. The Distinguished Gentleman called it ‘strikingly great,’ and it was long and classy with nice grit on its finish. There was a dollop of honey in its maturing flavor profile. This nutty Chevy was rock solid (95M).

A 1992 Drouhin Montrachet Marquis de Laguiche followed, and it was very sweet in the nose. It managed to keep it all together, and wasn’t as sweet on the palate. This was a round, satiny and smooth wine, just beautiful and showing that the vintage still has something to say…here and there (94M).

The 1990 Ramonet Batard Montrachet crushed everything so far. ‘Super’ summed it up well. It was very nutty with pure waterfall aromas. It was like ‘Welcome to the Jungle.’ There was a great combination of earth and caramel happening, and Say It Ain’t Joe called it ‘killer.’ This was Ramonet at its finest, and there weren’t many witnesses left after this longer, bigger and better wine (96+M).

The 1991 Ramonet Montrachet followed, and while terroir often trumps vintage, the 1991 couldn’t keep up. It was still excellent, ‘fully in the zone,’ per Dapper. This was much more mature than the 1990, a quality of the vintage for whites. This was earthy, yeasty, gamy and smooth, although someone found it ‘taut and youthful’ (93M).

We crossed the bridge to the world of Pinot Noir, and we began with a world dominator, a magnum of 1988 Roumier Bonnes Mares Vieilles Vignes. This wine was worth the trip to San Francisco. Dapper Dave noted, ‘crazy velvet,’ and he wasn’t talking about Big Boy’s pants lol. Actually, it was thanks to Big Boy that we had this incredibly rare wine. This magnum left all the hens teethless, as only Big Boy could and still can do. My notes started, ‘spectacular wine, out of control great.’ I am getting goosebumps just writing about it again. Its nose had sappy, red cherry fruit with bright bing and traces of citrus. Dave felt it was just entering its plateau. Its palate was long and extraordinary, gritty and powerful. This was a spicy hot mama that left me licking my lips after its last kiss good night. It was so good that it left me concentrated all over (99M).

The 1985 DRC Romanee St. Vivant that followed was dealt a tough hand. It didn’t help itself with its dirty nose, consistent with the bottle I also sampled this year. It still had sappy and seepy red fruit in its dirty nose and leathery palate. While rich and earthy, it got dirtier in the glass, bordering on Tootsie Roll (94M).

A 1978 Clair Dau Bonnes Mares was also rich and earthy, on the greater side than the previous wine. There was great citrus smack to its heavy and honeyed palate. This magnum showed 1978’s sweetness at its finest (95M).

The 1979 DRC Richebourg had an incredible nose full of cedar, cherry oil, honey and cream. There was great acidity to its palate, which had more menthol and cola flavors. This was a spectacular wine, lip smackingly great, and clearly the second best magnum of the night so far (97M).

The 1982 Rousseau Chambertin was flirty and delicious, just right, so to speak. Its finish was still powerful, slightly alcoholic yet rich like Warbucks. There was nothing wrong, just everything right in this mature, tasty Rousseau (94M).

The last magnum on this starry evening would be served blind. Big boy was still in the house, and he was finishing up with a bang. This was a rusty, spicy and zippy wine. It kept me licking the roof of my mouth, and the first guess was ‘1969.’ It wasn’t ’69, but it was a good guess. That rusty and acidity style was all ’69, but others preferred a different position. 1964 and 1959 both entered the conversation, and so did La Tache. Neil Diamonds lassoed the bull with a ’70s DRC’ guess. The wine was a stunning magnum of 1970 DRC Romanee Conti. Producer, producer, producer. This wine was wicked, possessing peel, both of the fruit variety and the see you later one, too (97M).

And many of us would see each other again the night after at La Paulee gala. I have covered this great celebration of Burgundy with full notes in my younger years, but I am not as young as I used to be. So here are the scores for the 30 wines for which I wrote something down, the over/under on wines tasted that aren’t listed is four.

1. 2007 Domaine Leflaive Chevalier Montrachet (94)
2. 2004 Domaine Leflaive Batard Montrachet (95)
3. 2008 Drouhin Montrachet Marquis de Laguiche (94)
4. 2007 Roulot Meursault Perrieres (96+)
5. 2006 Jadot Corton Charlemagne (93)
6. 2000 Domaine Leflaive Chevalier Montrachet (DQ)
7. 1992 Carillon Bienvenues Batard Montrachet (95)
8. 1986 Ramonet Batard Montrachet (96)
9. 1989 Fontaine Gagnard Montrachet (95)
10. 1999 Sauzet Montrachet (95)
11. 1990 Ramonet Bienvenues Batard Montrachet (95)
12. 2008 DRC Echezeaux (95)
13. 2001 Bouchard La Romanee (93)
14. 2008 Liger Belair La Romanee (97)
15. 1990 Roumier Bonnes Mares (97+)
16. 2001 Jayer Echezeaux (95)
17. 1978 Dujac Morey St. Denis 1er Cru (92)
18. 1999 Dujac Echezeaux (93)
19. 1991 DRC Grands Echezeaux (95)
20. 1990 DRC Romanee St. Vivant (94)
21. 1996 DRC Richebourg (95+)
22. 1966 DRC La Tache (92)
23. 1990 Leroy Corton Charlemagne (94)
24. 1986 Meo-Camuzet Nuits St. Georges Boudots (97)
25. 1983 Roumier Bonnes Mares (95)
26. 1995 Truchot Charmes Chambertin TVV (94)
27. 1978 DRC Grands Echezeaux (96)
28. 1978 Dujac Clos St. Denis (95)
29. 2011 Raveneau Chablis Les Clos (96+)

A few brief comments about the night. The Roulot was out of jero thanks to Sir Robert, and another perfect example of why Roulot is now considered one of the world’s greatest white winemakers. Ramonets continued to shock and awe, that mid-seventies to mid-nineties era has very little competition when it comes to white Burgundy. DRC continues to prove bottle after bottle why it is largely considered the greatest producer in the world. There was an overabundance of riches on this night, which would continue late into the evening, but the three standouts were the Liger Belair, the 1990 Roumier and the Meo-Camuzet. Everyone knows by now how great I think Louis Michel’s wines are, and it was exciting to see this young buck stand out amongst the older crowd, wine wise, that is. That is generally a handicap for most wines, serving a younger wine against older ones, but not for Louis Michel. The wines of Liger Belair are both delicious in their youth while still possessing enormous potential. I cannot wait to follow future vintages for decades to come. The 1990 Roumier followed the footsteps of the VV magnum quite admirably. Everything was in the right place, and the wine still felt young. It seized the attention of my palate and delivered a bar that was not met for the rest of the evening….with perhaps one exception, an exception all the more exceptional based on its 1er cru terroir. The 1986 Meo Boudots was an incredible wine, and why not? It was made by Henri Jayer, after all. From 1985-1988, Henri was the winemaker for Meo-Camuzet, making these vintages absolute jewels for Jayer lovers. However, some of these bottles were filtered versus unfiltered, and the unfiltered ones are the best, at least in my opinion. So there is variation. Regardless, this bottle was thrilling, and another testament to the legend that is Henri Jayer.

That’s the happy recap, at least all that’s fit for print.

In Vino Veritas,
JK

Super Tuesday

Before the good ‘ol USA had its political version of Super Tuesday, a few of us in New York City conducted our own version a week prior. The Mogul, Gentleman Jim, Lady Agah and Alexander The Great all gathered on Tuesday the 23rd (of February) at Vaucluse, Michael White’s homage to French cuisine. If you haven’t been, check it out. Anyone who knows me knows I am a big Michael White fan. See Marea.

Duck L’Orange at Vaucluse

First thing was first, so we started with a 1985 Salon. This bottle was a bit mature, not unusual for Salon in the 1980s unfortunately due to some importing issues with certain shipments. The wine market has come a long way since then. It was still outstanding, but clearly more mature than it should have been, advanced without being off. It tasted at least a decade older, if not more, but it hadn’t turned or gone sour. Its palate was rich, honeyed, oily and long. Gamey white fruits escaped the autumnal personality disorder it had developed (95A).

The Polls Are Open

There was only one white wine served on this night, but what a white wine it was, a 1999 Coche-Dury Corton Charlemagne. How good is that? I rhetorically asked myself, already knowing the answer. The Mogul cooed how ‘silky’ it was. Make no mistake about it, this was a rich and decadent wine with that signature Coche popcorn kernel. I couldn’t stop drinking it; it was that tasty. Its wintry spice had me writing, ‘soooooo good!’ It was round, rich and continuously getting better with each sip, with just the perfect amount of sweetness. Having just done a vertical of twenty vintages of Coche a couple weeks prior, I have to say it felt like it stood out even more on its own. I hope my score was consistent lol (97+).

The Mogul pulled out a pleasant surprise, a 1961 Trotanoy. This was an incredibly well-stored bottle, so fresh with its fruit, yet mature with its mocha and cocoa. Lady Agah noticed, ‘licorice,’ and slate joined the party with time. This was purple city with a black night overhead, and Alexander The Great chipped in, ‘cured leather.’ This was another spectacular bottle that I felt could easily go another two plus decades (97).

TKO

Unfortunately, a 1959 Ausone was not in the greatest condition. It was clearly advanced and porty, and Gentleman Jim found ‘celery’ in it, along with ‘molasses.’ It was still drinkable, morphing into lots of caramel, but considering the company at the table, no one was drinking it much (92A).

We were on to the Burgundies beginning with a 1985 Rousseau Gevrey-Chambertin Clos St. Jacques. It was gorgeous, but more elegant than I expected. This was a pretty, beautiful Burgundy, but it didn’t seem to have anywhere to go from here. There were lots of red and citrus in its flavor profile, and its palate was smooth and elegant. I must confess I wanted a bit more, but I got that and then some in the wine to follow (94).

Beauty & the Beast

The 1985 Ponsot Clos de la Roche Vieilles Vignes was a gargantuan wine. ‘Super’ was quickly followed by ‘duper’ in my notes. There was mega concentration in this freakishly great wine. If sausage were a beverage, and you were a sausage lover, this wine would be the shit, or the tits, which one is better? I guess tits are better lol. Sausage, tits, this wine had everything in the right places. Ok, I’ll stop there, or am I too late already. Cola and black fruits almost created this black hole of wine domination. This was a ‘wow’ wine, heavy duty and super rich. No one could deny this was one of the greatest wines ever made. I wish there were more vintages like this (98).

The 1964 Giacomo Conterno Barolo Monfortino Riserva that followed was overmatched. While this was an elegant, smooth and beautiful example of mature Barolo, it had the disservice of following the Ponsot. It was a bit dry and citrusy, and I have had many better vintages of old Monfortino. Drink this vintage up (93).

The Other Sides of ’64

The 1964 Jaboulet Hermitage La Chapelle was another spectacular wine. The shadow of the 1961 La Chapelle is so large that everything prior and thereafter until the 1978 is practically ignored in the market, but let me tell you there are so many phenomenal old La Chapelles just waiting to be discovered. The ’64 was monumental, and got an immediate ‘incredible’ from Gentleman Jim. This was rich and decadent, as good as anything we had on this starry night. This ’64 might even have outshined certain bottles of ’61. The Mogul likened it to ‘the gates of hell meeting sweet nectar.’ Hell yeah (98).

We called it a night, it was Tuesday after all. Our own version of Super Tuesday may not bethe ot as newsworthy as the one that followed, but it definitely was a lot more enjoyable.

Night Night

In Vino Veritas,
JK

First Blood

2015 was a very good year. Except for me writing articles about tasting wines. I went on a hiatus, a sabbatical, a leave of absence if you will, but I wasn’t absent. I just looked over an entire year of tasting notes, handwritten, of course, and it filled me with lots of great memories, joy and a few “where the f*@k was I’s?”

I just realized that I need to remember to date and location stamp where I am when I am at a serious tasting, but I think I knew where I was about 80-90% of the time. Is that good lol? 120 flights and 300,000+ miles will do that to a man.

My original plan was to get back in the writing saddle and set the bar with my greatest memories of 2015. Seven weeks later, I realize that may be a bit too ambitious for me currently. Am I getting older, busier or better? Fret not, I am still drinking better, and about a month ago in Hong Kong saw me at my first great tasting of the year. The Sifu was the host, and for those that love their fine wine, there is no better host in Hong Kong, and arguably the world.

My last trip to Hong Kong was also a triumphant return for Alexander The Great, who joined me on this special evening. There was an issue with her and getting a cab, and before you know it, we were in crisis mode. We arrived stressed out, as we were thirty minutes late. A warm and calming welcome from The Sifu and his wife, along with To The Victor, had us back at ease. I think there were eight of us total, but it could have been ten.

Crisis in Hong Kong

I had told the Sifu earlier in the week that I would be bringing a pair of 2011 White Burgundies: a Lafon Montrachet and a Bouchard Chevalier La Cabotte. Not bad for a dinner party right? I handed them over to him upon arrival, and he quickly handed them over to one of his staff, never to be seen again. Based on the wines that would follow, that would be quite alright.

To add the festivities, all the wines were served blind. For the sake of my own reputation, I will leave most of my guesses out of the article lol. Well, maybe not all. The first wine reminded me of an oxidized Champagne, bruised and battered but not down. Its nose shrieked green olives, and The Sifu noted ‘slight botrytis and a slightly oxidative style.’ This was a wine that really benefitted from food, which seemed to wake it up and make it more alive. It got richer and sexier in a unique way. I guess richer is always sexier lol. Fleshy, long and gamy, this wine had honey emerge as it got better and better, and it was a surprisingly good 1972 DRC Montrachet. This was an oldie and a goodie, but only a penitent man shall pass (95).

Surprise Surprise

We moved to the reds immediately, where a magnum of something intriguing awaited. The first red was very floral and pungent in its nose, with lots of red fruits, BBQ and carob at first sniff. Graves and 1952 came to my mind for this dry Bordeaux. At least I got the Bordeaux part right! Charcoal and gravel cemented my initial thoughts, but this was a 90 year old 1926 Mouton Rothschild. Out of magnum. Sifu in the hoooowwwwwwsssssssse…make that his house. This was another older wine that got better and better in the glass. This was an extraordinary bottle, and black olives, cream, dust and minerals emerged. The Sifu added, ‘game, cassis, mint. Quite typical Mouton.’ I’ll have what he’s having (95M).

Big Brother is Always Watching in HK

The third wine had a delicious nose, with sweet fruits and tender aromas of wheat. It was blacker in style, gamy with a pinch of BBQ. Its palate was round, rich and long, certainly deserving outstanding status. The wine was heavy yet dancing with a bit of zip. Buttery and decadent, this was clearly a special wine. One of the educated ladies guessed, ‘Spanish,’ but it was a magnum of 1961 Margaux. This was sweet, outstanding stuff. It was then noted that if Parker hasn’t had a great bottle/note of an old Bordeaux, it was like it didn’t exist, kind of like the ’61 Margaux (96M).

A Forgotten Legend

The fourth wine was clearly another Bordeaux. It was classic in every sense of the word, a super wine that was so well-knit. I was thinking 1975 La Mission, but it was a 1961 Mouton Rothschild. ‘Sleek and silky,’ this wine was the most pure, the youngest and with the most potential. It had true grit and true elegance. This was a ‘wow’ wine, although the first bottle served was clearly better. It takes two to make a wine dinner go right, you know (96).

We moved to Burgundy territory in deep ocean fashion, with a sweet, honeyed and decadent Pinot. It had beautiful red rose and red fruit aromas. To The Victor agreed, citing ‘strawberries.’ Others admired its ‘acidity, spice and oak.’ One guest guessed ‘1980s Echezeaux,’ but it was 2000 DRC La Tache. Out of magnum. Again. I gotta admit, the 2000 LT mag was so perfect, so now. The Sifu found it ‘so a (ah) point (pwahn).’ That’s French for ‘on point’ lol. Don’t be such a connard (95M).

A Whole Lotta La Tache

What could possibly be next? We were in the palm of The Sifu’s hand right now, mere puppets in his show. He could have served us anything at this point, but he served us a 1978 DRC La Tache. Sifu, I love you man. Its nose was deep and dark, black, blue and purple. It was so rich and so great, decadent Burgundy at its finest. The word ‘decadent’ kept coming up, which is a good thing. Kisses of cedar and garden had me asking myself in my notes, ‘Is it DRC?’ It was another ‘wow’ bottle from The Sifu (98).

We were back to magnums with the next Burgundy, which was unfortunately corked. That was too bad, as it was a 1980 Henri Jayer Echezeaux (DQ). That’s what we call ‘The Big Hurt,’ when your $10,000 magnum is corked, but The Sifu was unfazed. He quickly disappeared to the cellar, where he returned with a substitute teacher. Our newest professor had a deep nose full of vitamins and spice. Thick, rich, long and zippy, this was a perfect bottle ‘from a perfect cellar,’ as To The Victor admired. The Sifu claimed that ‘this is a vintage that puzzles a lot of people.’ He then added, ‘what separates the men from the boys is a difficult vintage.’ This bottle of 1987 Henri Jayer Echezeaux was more like 1985 than 1987, another ‘wow’ wine. No mercy! I gave it (95), but I wrote ‘even 96 points.’ Jayer was the master of the difficult vintage, for sure.

What’s a Little Seepage Between Friends?

The next wine was the final wine for which I took notes. It was all about the Milk Duds, with chocolate and caramel all over its rich and tasty body. There weren’t many more notes at this point, other than ‘Spanish wine, so delicious, Unico!!!’ And ‘MAG’ with an arrow featuring many ups and downs. Oh, it was a 1962 Vega Sicilia Unico, of course (97M).

Unico-rn Wine

Slowly but surely, all the guests left except us. Then there were cigars, spoonfuls of caviar and shots of vodka, which I didn’t even remember until the next day. I think we left around 230AM. And Alexander The Great and I didn’t go to bed right after we left. The next thing I know, it was 1130AM, and I noticed a lot of missed calls. That’s right, The Sifu had invited me to lunch, and his secretary was frantically trying to confirm our attendance at lunch. Alexander The Great threw in the towel, and I thought twice, but I rallied enough to tell them I was coming, but that I would be only one.

Cigars, Caviar, Vodka & Alexander The Great

It was a big Burgundy week in Hong Kong, and numerous producers were in town, including two of my favorites, Etienne de Montille and Jean-Marc Roulot, who were also at lunch. I was not surprisingly the last to arrive, just in time for a taste of two of Jean-Marc’s newest creations, including his first vintage of Chevalier Montrachet. I didn’t take notes, as I was still getting my sea legs under me, but I can tell you that Jean-Marc showed why he continues to be one of the greatest, if not the greatest, producer of white wines in the world. And if someone told me the 1996 Krug in front of me was Clos du Mesnil, I probably would have drunk more of that, too.

Bet You Never Saw This

The next wine motivated me to get back on the horse and take some notes. And it should have, as it was a 1985 DRC Montrachet. It was so exotic with lots of garden, bouillon and botrytis aromas. There was a green weed kaleidoscope thing going on, and I didn’t smoke before lunch. The wine kept getting more honeyed and buttery and creamy and and and…every sip got better and sweeter (97).

My Most Liked Picture of All Time

A quartet of DRC Romanee St. Vivants followed, led by the 1997. Garden aromas were greeted by earth, rubber and rust. There was nice structure here for the vintage, and a tighter style than most ’97 Burgs. This was an excellent wine, but it had the disservice of following the Montrachet (93).

The 1990 DRC Romanee St. Vivant that followed showed more autumnal and leafy aromas, along with cedar, tomato and menthol. It had a rich and leathery palate, both classy and classic. There were stir-fried beef edges to this round and thick wine. It needed time, as it held and expanded in the glass. This was a wine that could handle the gym, and more cedar and bamboo emerged on the palate (96).

The 1985 DRC Romanee St. Vivant was all about the orange peel and rust, with this twisted acid thing happening. More autumn emerged, along with tea, tree bark and this wet fungus-y goodness. There were tertiary flavors here, making me think that this won’t get any better, and it got dirtier and dirtier in the glass (94).

The 1971 DRC Romanee St. Vivant was a touch mature and advanced, gamy and forward with brown sugar, Worcestershire and butter cream aromas. There was rich and sumptuous fruit in the mouth; if the bottle was perfect, it would have been 96 points, but it was not perfect (94A).

Four of A Kind, or Is It A Flush?

We got served a curveball next, with a wine from a producer that I confess I do not know well. The 1995 Jacky Truchot Clos de la Roche TVV had a big, rich nose with lots of orange and red cherry fruit aromas. Some complex dirt and rust complemented its fruit components well, as this was a well-balanced wine in every sense of the word. There was nice spice, nice grit, nice fruit and a touch of mushroom and truffle on the palate. This was a solid wine (94+).

Standing Tall

I know I haven’t been writing, but I definitely have been drinking. Bottoms up!

In Vino Veritas,
JK

A Great American Birthyear Celebration

Hello everyone, it’s been a very long four months since my last article, and I am a bit embarrassed, I must say. The notes, however, are still piling up, getting a bit mountainous here in 2015. Getting more tasting notes published is on the agenda for the second half of the year, so hopefully I will be able to share a few more of the great experiences I am able to have on a weekly basis.

Let It Breathe

Speaking of which, this month of May is all about ‘A Great American Cellar Built Over The Last 35 Years,’ so it seemed a good time to pick up the pen again, as this collection is definitely a motivational speaker for me. By now, you will have read a lot more about him. He is in every way what ‘Vintage Tastings’ are all about; a kindred soul to all of us who enjoy drinking, tasting and sharing the world’s finest wines. He has attended and provided for many great tastings over the years, including numerous Wine Workshop and Bipin Desai events, and in the spirit of those events and the overall offering, we gathered together in his home recently for a birthyear celebration of all those in attendance.

The Lineup

Now not many people can invite eight guests to a dinner party, ask everyone their birthyear, and come up with eleven wines from five different vintages from six different wine regions. This is a true drinker’s collection, and what makes this ‘A Great American Cellar.’ On to the wines…

We whet our whistles with some 1988 Krug, the birthyear of his soon-to-married daughter. The 1988, along with the 1982, remains arguably the best Krug of the decade, and this bottle was classic. It was a bit of a brute in a good way with its young, big finish. There was a lot of citrus still in this broad-shouldered wine, one that is still waiting to hit that secondary level of development (96).

Krug With A View

The 1971 Krug Champagne was next, his first experience with truly great Champagne back in 1982, and ‘it has gotten even better.’ This was pure apple pie, in a dry and sophisticated way, with supporting aromas of bread crust and honey. Round and long, this was a perfect bottle, emitting butter crumb flavors with a smoky and toasty personality. It got more and more buttery with time in the glass, and cream soda and earth switched sides of the court well and often. That was my birthyear, by the way (97).

I got to double down with an exceptionally rare bottle of 1971 Haut Brion Blanc. Glue, white smoke, honey comb, mint and a touch of fresh herbs all played gleefully together in its nose. Someone observed ‘pine’ and ‘wintergreen.’ It was still so young and fresh, and our host commented how ‘these age forever.’ Its palate was long, sexy and elegant yet also powerful with layers of complexity. There was great meat and balance to its palate, with a cave-like finish, like limestone dripping from stalagmites or stalactites, whichever ones hang from the ceiling lol. Secondary coconut added even more appeal to this already delicious wine (96).

The Kings of Bordeaux Blanc

A 1947 Laville Haut Brion reminded me of how great a value this wine still is. Well, actually, it isn’t in the context of it now being La Mission Haut Brion Blanc, but it is in the context of finding old Lavilles still in the market place. This 1947 had a deeper, darker color with more seashell in its nose. It wasn’t quite as open as the HBB and felt a step behind at first smell. It needed to be worked more to open up, which can often be the case with something this old. There were lots of candle wax aromas along with glue and paint edges. As it improved with time, its finish got thicker, and its candle wax morphed into beeswax while this library quality emerged. A little Dirty South/baby powder edge developed in this wine that was right on the border of being outstanding. Then again, at this age, it is all about the bottle, and there are many shades of gray. This 1947 was still a good bottle, but it was a little bit naughty. Insert your own spanking sound here (94).

Space Invader

A trio of Lambrays was next, beginning with our second wine from our youngest vintage and a 1988 Clos des Lambrays. It had a deep nose with great vitamin fruit, a lot more fruit than I remember having in any 1988 Burgundy for a while. There were solid red fruits on the palate, but a darker and drier finish. This was a ‘gamey, gone wild and sauvage’ wine in a ‘meet the Flintstones’ (vitamin) kind of way (93).

Clos Des Lambrays

The 1958 Clos des Lambrays had a lot of metal at first, but there was some surprisingly great fruit underneath. There was a bit of a reconditioning debate that ensued, but this ended up clean and pretty with pleasant red fruit. This was the vintage of both our hosts (92).

The 1947 Clos des Lambrays was a stunner. It had a fabulous nose that was super aromatic with great spice. Mint, painted wall, autumn and lovely red fruit blended into its great aroma and flavor profile. Appealing grill qualities emerged in this gritty, cherry bomb of a wine (96).

1958 was a better vintage for its Nebbiolo friends, and we went right to the penthouse with a 1958 Giacomo Conterno Barolo Monfortino Riserva. Light leather and deep, black Nebbiolo fruit mixed with tar and tobacco for a decidedly different and inviting nose. It was very dry with that long, dusty and gritty tail of Nebbiolo, still possessing great black fruits on its palate. This 1958 still gave a youthful impression (94).

Magic Monfortino

It seemed to be a day for 1947, as the 1947 Giacomo Conterno Barolo Monfortino Riserva was spectacular, as good a bottle of this as I have ever had. Someone compared it to walking into ‘a sausage and cheese shop.’ Two of my favorite things lol. Chocolate, mushrooms and all types of nuts were found in this insane wine. It was so tasty in a chocolaty way, showing more flesh than the 1958, but it was also big and long. It got deeper and really stretched out in the glass. Greatness, just like another Italian from ’47, Sweet Lou (98)!

Bird’s Eye View

A 1972 Heitz Martha’s Vineyard Cabernet Sauvignon was a delightful and delicious surprise. No one talks about 1972 in California as a good vintage, but it sure seemed like one after a glass of this beauty. Aromas of chocolate, mint and eucalyptus gave way to a rock solid and rocky wine. This is as close to claret as California gets, and certainly better than any ’72 Claret at the moment. It was a delicious and scrumptious wine, with a similar palate to the nose (95).

A Pleasant Surprise

The cellar was now an impressive ’10 for 10,’ as one guest put it. There was one wine to go. Our cellar’s story came full circle with a bottle of 1971 Von Simmern Hattenheimer Nussbrunnen Trockenbeerenauslese. Say that ten times quickly! Thankfully, we didn’t have to, as our mouths were already full of this decadent nectar, which almost looked like a Burgundy at the right angle. But this was no Burgundy. This was a rich, deep wine with loads of coffee, petrol, forest, molasses and oil. There was this Milanese edge to its motor oil, and this was a butterball of a mouthful of sweet wine (96).

The evening was a perfect snapshot of this Great American Cellar, a true drinker’s cellar that will continue to reward hundreds of new drinkers over the next 35 years. I look forward to sharing many more great nights together with this true connoisseur accordingly, and with bottles from his cellar with many of you!

In Vino Veritas,
JK

  • Sign Up
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.
×

Cart

Sign up for Acker exclusive offers, access to amazing wine events & world-class wine content!



    Please note there will be a credit card usage fee of two percent (2%) on the total auction purchase price up to the credit card payment limit of USD$15,000, HKD$150,000, or SGD$20,000 for live auctions, and on the total amount charged on internet auctions (except where prohibited by applicable law).