Vintage Tastings

By John Kapon

Experience the finest and rarest wines in the world through the eyes and palate of Acker Chairman and globally renowned master taster, John Kapon (our “JK”). “Vintage Tastings” is a written journal chronicling the incredible bottles opened at some of the most exclusive tastings, wine dinners, and events all over the globe. These entries represent JK’s commitment to capturing and sharing the ephemeral nature and ultimate privilege of tasting the world’s rarest wines. Although ratings are based on a 100-point scale, JK believes there is no such thing as a 100-point wine. Point scores assigned to each wine are his own personal attempt to quantify the quality of each experience.

The Holiday BYO

Every year, we here at Acker have a fun, holiday tradition – a BYO party at The Tribeca Grill where over 100 people get together and share bottles from their cellars. It is an evening that underscores the essence of wine itself – sharing and love. It is also an evening that can get a bit out of control, as there can be a dizzying amount of wines in the room, not only moving around at any given table, but also moving around the room with their owners. It is always an amazing, random mix of so many great wines, a kinetic winergy rarely equaled.

Last year, somehow the schedule got messed up, and I could not attend. I was determined not to miss it two years in a row, and I flew back from Hong Kong just to make it in time to step off a plane, sleep for four hours, and wake up for dinner. It was worth the effort. Perhaps the jet lag got the best of me, as my record # of tasting notes for this event was 52 this year I had only 26, but what a 26 they were.

It began innocently enough with a 2008 Sauzet Chevalier Montrachet. 2008 White Burgs can be ripe and rich, and this had some yeasty, sweet fruit and a round finish. I wanted a little more out of this wine, which felt a little simple by the usual Sauzet and Chevalier standards (92).

I couldn’t ask for anything more from the 2000 Coche-Dury Meursault Perrieres. What a wine. This was fabulous from first sniff, full and quite rich for 2000. It had signature white fruits and that Coche kink, and it still felt young and ascending. This was a monumental expression of Chardonnay (96).

That was it for the whites yes, it is still a red, red world, although I am a big consumer of white wines personally. We began with Bordeaux a debate would ensue the next night about Bordeaux before Burgundy or Burgundy before Bordeaux, but on this night we went South to North. A 1949 Lafite Rothschild was a little weedy and musty but classic underneath. It was a gentle giant with classic pencil aromas and tender tea flavors. This was a wine enjoying its retirement, although affected by the cork (93A).

A shot of 1990 Vogue Musigny Vieilles Vignes quickly interrupted the Bordeaux courtesy of the Rapmaster, and this was better than usual. This has been a controversial wine for a while now, often coming across stewed, gamey and/or milky, but sometimes not. This was a solid wine, displaying some richness and robust qualities along with roasted red fruits. It was still a bit square and rugged, but I didn’t mind the flavor profile of this particular bottle. Perhaps this wine will always be a tale of two bottles (92).

We were back to our regular programming with a not-so-regular 1985 Lafleur. This was all about its blackness in a fruit and olive way. It was a dark and brooding wine, showing the other side of Lafleur. Lafleurs can be super sweet and kinky, or dark and brooding, almost in Jekyll and Hyde fashion depending on the vintage. This still had some classic kink without being overly sweet, although it did get a touch sweeter in the nose. The Copperhead found it ‘a touch dry,’ without trying to be negative (94).

The 1989 DRC Romanee St. Vivant kept sticking their noses in my palate. Its nose was awful, not cooked, not corked, just flawed. It was like sour milk city. The palate was better at first, showing some typical 1989 qualities, so I recommended that it sit for a bit and work itself out. Unfortunately, when we came back to it about an hour later, it was completely sour. It was a perplexing wine, and I was unsure if it was the bottle or the wine (NR?).

We were back to Bordeaux with a 1943 Latour, the second time I have had this ancient, rare wine this year. Thankfully, Jason had/has a (now partial) case J. Its nose was deep, chunky and chocolaty, showing unexpected strength from an unheralded vintage. Its flavors were wheaty and a touch porty, but it still had some up front freshness to its hint of game. Deep and dark, this was a classic Latour, although my previous notes revealed the last bottle was a bit better. At this age, it all comes down to the bottle, even when from the same case (91).

A 1982 Margaux was classic all the way. It had really nice fruit with fifty shades of black and purple. While there was deep fruit, there was delicate spice and that typical Margaux seductiveness. Its palate was round and lush with nice tannins. This is still grace in a glass (95+).

The 1970 Petrus remains one of my favorite wines from this important Chateau. Why? Well, it’s a great vintage and it’s about the same price as the ‘lesser’ young vintages. The smart money that drinks will stick with the ’70, or other oldies of the sorts. The Petrus had rich fruit and a coconutty kink. This was meaty and chewy accordingly, a rich brew courtesy of some Pomerol witchcraft. Lush and complete, the ’70 sang like a baritone and stung like a bee (96).

A Holiday Flight

Hamburger snuck in some 1998 Chave Hermitage, and I was glad he did. This was a saucy and delicious red, a vintage that is completely undervalued in the market for Chave, and about and sexy and seductive as a ‘young’ Chave can be (95).

We switched gears with a pair of Italians thanks to David et Fils, beginning with a 1967 Giacomo Conterno Barolo Monfortino Riserva. While its nose wasn’t so great at first, it had delicious tea flavors. As David Senior noted, ‘it’s not perfect but it works.’ Carob and caramel rounded out its dusty palate. Many old Barolos get tea-like, especially depending on the vintage (93).

The 1990 Gaja Barbaresco Costa Russi delivered toffee and coffee with lots of leather and tar behind it and on its long finish. This was a rich and classic Gaja (94).

A swallow of 2008 Raveneau Chablis Vaillons was easy and pleasing, but the second ’08 white that under-delivered on this night (90).

A magnum of 1970 Latour proved to be tasty. This was pretty by the usual Latour standards, open and soft with some red cherry buttressed by walnut. This will always be an excellent, but never a great, Latour (93M).

We finally made it to the red Burgundies it was a lot of work to get here, but we were primed and ready. The Copperhead signed, sealed and delivered with a 1990 Rousseau Chambertin. This was a ‘wow’ wine, possessing green bean goodness in its nose along with some wet bamboo. There were delicious and rich red fruit flavors that had that green, stalky goodness. The bamboo stayed and had no zled. This was a long, elegant yet substantial wine. Someone mentioned ‘Catherine Deneuve’ (97).

I brought a 1990 Ponsot Clos de la Roche Vieilles Vignes. Why would I bring the 1990 Ponsot? Well, it happened to be the best bottle of Burgundy hanging out in the store, and I had just stepped off a 16-hour flight it was an easy decision. Unfortunately, it was slightly corked. If you could get past its corked qualities, there was a rich, beefy and saucy wine that was one of the most concentrated of the night. There were menthol and meat flavors, but this was definitely corked to the point where it was tough to continue. Someone mentioned ‘Brigitte Bardot.’ If I had to guestimate, I would put this wine in the (96A) category. It would definitely be outstanding were it not corked.

1990 Greatness

The 1993 Roumier Bonnes Mares that followed had a great, reserved nose that was long and smooth. This was really good but reticent, black and dark. It was shut down, and we didn’t have enough time to get to know it on this night, but it had me thinking about it long after I left (95+).

A 1991 Dominus interjected. I love Dominus there are few California Cabs that I enjoy as much, and a recent 2006 had me licking my lips and someone else’s. But I didn’t love this 1991. It was green, round and soft. I just didn’t feel it (91).

I felt the 1993 Vogue Musigny Vieilles Vignes, however. It had the tight, ’93 edge but again was a bit soft and reserved, a la the Roumier. Was it a phase? Was it this night? Was it that 1990 outshined 1993 for a change? Not sure, but I definitely have had better bottles, or rather bottles that have shown better (93+).

Mason Perry’s 1995 DRC La Tache entered on cue, or on clue. It had clean and lean fruit and a delicate nose. This was a fresh and smooth 1995 that was light, elegant and beautiful and far from the rusty nails that many wines from this vintage can be (94).

The 1993 Roumier Chambolle Musigny Amoureuses let me know that 1993s weren’t all shut down at the moment. This had a fantastic nose that was rich and much more complicated than either of the previous ’93s. This had juice that was loose, and it ‘KO’d the Bonne Mares,’ as one guest put it. Although it was clearly better on this night, I wasn’t 100% certain it was the better wine. This was rich, open and dare I say ready. For a 1993 red Burg, that’s almost an insult lol (97).

Seeing Double

Right turn, Rhone, with an excellent 1995 Rostaing Cote Rotie Cote Blonde. This was all about the classic pepper and violet with almost white fruit. It was tasty, balanced and long I was impressed (94).

The Rostaing outpaced the 1998 Guigal Cote Rotie La Mouline that followed. The La Mouline was richer, more oaky and more concentrated but somehow delivered less (93).

A 1970 Palmer was completely (DQ),corked, I believe.

I probably took a swallow of another 6-8 wines, but I stopped writing after two of them, an excellent, hearty and solid 1990 Faiveley Chambertin Clos de Beze (94) and a sweet, buttery and corny 2001 Ramonet Batard Montrachet (93).

That’s all folks!

The Ugly Aftermath

In Vino Veritas,
JK

The Mogul Strikes Back

It’s tough to find a good bottle of Bordeaux in New York City…an open one, at least. Well, there just happens to be a few good Americans left that still love their Bordeaux…old and mature, of course. Thanks to The Mogul, who is probably atop the Bordeaux drinking charts in the USA, many of New York’s wine cognoscenti were reminded of just how good a great old Bordeaux can be, or visa versa.

I think there were about ten of us, so Lady Agah brought a double magnum of 1961 Lafite Rothschild. Niiiiice. And so was this bottle, which was about as good as this wine ever gets. There was honeyed fruit and nice supporting carob and cedar aromas. There was a delicate spice to its sweet, enticing nose. A big debate ensued about the overall quality of the wine; there was no question this was in ‘excellent’ territory, 93-94 points for those of you keeping score. Dapper Dave admired its ‘velvety animal texture.’ It was soft, easy and creamy, just beautiful. Every refresher invigorated the wine again. I was kind of torn between 93 and 94 points, vacillating back and forth. Bottles will likely score lower, but I could still go back to it at the end of the night after all the great wine that ensued…and still enjoy. Drink up, as not all bottles are created like double magnums, and this isn’t one of the legendary wines from this legendary vintage (93D).

A Good Beginning

Who says China gets all the Lafite? Not The Mogul, who pulled out a 1959 Lafite Rothschild next. What a great bottle, this was clearly deeper and darker than the 1961. There was much more forest and cedar to this black Knight and night of a wine. Gentleman Jim noted ‘cinnamon, allspice and clove.’ Its flavors showed carob again, but this time with layers of caramel on top. This was a rich and saucy wine with nice concentrate to it in a grape seed and oil kind of way. There were solid desert flavors on its dry finish. This ‘screamed’ Lafite to Big Boy (97).

The next flight began with a 1959 La Mission Haut Brion. This was chocolate city in the nose, along with coffee, mocha and rye toast. Smokehouse, cedar and gravel rounded out its nose in classic fashion, but the palate was a bit askew. ‘Stewy’ came from The Inspector, and ‘VA’ from Big Boy, who continued to coo about the ‘so clean’ ’59 Lafite. This was a dirty birdie for sure, but there is a place for clean, and a place for dirty. The palate was definitely a touch stewy, but also chewy. Cereal came out with time, and it got better, but I have had better (94A).

Twin ’59 Billers

Gentleman Jim noted ‘huge mint’ in a spectacular bottle of 1961 Haut Brion. A lot of ‘here here’s followed. The group couldn’t decide whether it was Peppermint Patty or Junior Mints, though. Forest and creamy fruit oozed out of its meaty nose. The palate was chocolaty and tasty, making me sneeze twice with its impressive expression. This was pure deliciousness. It was so exotically minty, it almost made me feel kinky. Long appropriately summed up its finish, and this was ultimately a WOTN (98).

A new bar was set, and the 1961 Latour kept pace. There was similar 1961 goodness here. Again, ripeness was on full display, but in a more purple and walnutty Latour way. There was also a touch of mint here, or maybe that was the Haut Brion still lingering! The Latour was not nearly as open as the HB, yet obviously heavy duty. There were thick thighs in its nose, and its palate was rich and long, ‘still the one,’ I wrote. Its palate was a quartet of so’s – so young, so fresh, so perfect and so long, but this was a wine that I didn’t want to see later, I wanted it right there, right then. Thick came to mind again. At first, I preferred the Latour, but the HB kept challenging and challenging, and many preferred the Graves in the end. It was a dead heat, but Latour is still on the way up (98+).

Twin ’61 Killers

We changed gears with a 1959 Ausone, which The Inspector didn’t like. It was a bit of a cherry bomb with some good medicine to it. There was some yeast to its chocolate, and nice wintergreen flavors on its lean and clean palate. Someone wasn’t in the clean camp, noting ‘chicken shit.’ I saw what he was saying, but nonetheless, it was rich, hearty and solid (93).

Tom Terrific brought a superb bottle of 1959 Petrus. I don’t think I have had or ever will have better. Its nose was super exotic like a coconut cake mixed with dried plums and a hint of fig. This was a perfect bottle, creaming in the glass and finding a balance between its bigness and great acidity. It kept getting better and better, but it was tough to defer the pleasure. This was a wine that would make one think about the consequences later (97).

Right Bank Booty

A 1961 Trotanoy was up for the challenge. This was another saucy and sexy Pomerol. It had a big nose and showed more classic components like wafer, chocolate and plum. This was sweet on the outside and the inside. It possessed more of an oily texture and was another long, great wine. 1961 Pomerols are about as good as it gets (97).

The 1959 Latour a Pomerol was another great ’59 Pomerol. Chocolate, chocolate and more chocolate emerged. One could ‘see the heat of the vintage,’ someone remarked. This may have not been as complex as some of the previous wines, but it was still fantastic. Similar descriptors such as long and creamy reappeared in my notes. Enjoyable was a good way to sum it up (95).

Oh Yes We Did

There was one more wine on this starry night, a 1961 Lafleur from an original wood case with great provenance. Ok now. Gentleman Jim found it ‘Burgundian,’ and Big Boy hailed it as ‘superior wine.’ ‘Perfect Pomerol’ and ‘wine of the night from the nose’ came from the crowd. This bottle was incredibly youthful, much less developed than the couple of others that I have been fortunate to try. Its fresh purple cascaded into a creamy pool of honeyed deliciousness. ‘Nuff said (96+).

Money Shot

True to form, The Mogul got up and excused himself from his own dinner, leaving us all in blissful shock and awe. He had another date after dinner. Actually, he had two.

In Vino Veritas,
JK

A Busy Week

I don’t really keep up with all the wines I drink. Not sure if that is a problem, I kind of look at it as a pleasure. Writing gives me joy, but sometimes joy is best kept behind closed doors lol. Not sure if I am getting wiser, but I am definitely getting older, but as long as there is wine on my dinner table, it’s all good.

So September saw me taking two trips to Asia in the same week. I am the worst travel agent, by the way. By the time I came back and gave birth to October’s HK sale, Fall was in full swing. Everyone was back in New York, and my first official week back had me seeing a few familiar faces such as The Don, The Rev, The Inspector and The Queen. Yes, if you don’t have a ‘The’ in front of your name, then you aren’t the one lol. I have a new one on the way, by the way, my fourth and final chapter. Thinking about naming him Kareem Abdul Kapon, has a nice ring to it.

I am not sure of the particular order of the wines sampled, but if anyone wants to wager, I will pay 100 to 1 if you can identify who brought which wine in this article. I am included, of course. 2005 Chateau de Beaucastel Roussanne Vieilles Vignes is a good place to start. This was kinky and big, like a well-placed high heel, rich and concentrated with that unique white Rhone flavor. Glue, inner yellow peel and stinky cheese rounded out this monstrous white (95).

Another kinky white Rhone was a 2006 Guigal Condrieu La Doriane. White Rhone has to be one of the more interesting and underappreciated categories in fine wine today. This was another full, big and rich ‘wow’ white. I loved its gamy intensity and drugged honey flavor (94+).

Awesome Atera

The 2007 Lafon Meursault Perrieres was smooth and direct like NFL Sundays. It had clean fruit, white with a touch of yellow along diamonds and minerals. There was nice flex to its muscle in this cut and fit white (94).

A stellar bottle of 1986 Leflaive Bienvenues Batard Montrachet made one of my nights. It had just the right amount of sweetness, not over top like many siblings from the vintage, ‘deelish’ came to mind. This was an impressive and lingering ’86, still young and still tight, just how I like it (95).

The last white of the week was a 2004 Dauvissat Chablis Les Clos. I am a huge fan of this wine in general. This particular bottle was a bit bready, but still easy to drink if you seek character and complexity as opposed to obviousness. That’s the essence of Chablis (92).

The 1993 Rousseau Chambertin Clos de Beze was a special treat with its aromas of forest, cedar and tree-like fruit. It was served a touch cold but made me feel warm and fuzzy anyway. Flavors of black, burnt rubber made me hot like revved up motors. This was life in the fast lane (96+).

Righteous Rousseau

The 1990 Rousseau Chambertin Clos de Beze was even better, this was a great ’90, immune to the ‘disease’ of the vintage, as the Burghound likes to call it. There was flesh to its fruit, meat to its bones, and flavors of tea, leather, game and sauce. Forest was also there, like Gretel without Hansel. There are dueling banjos and dueling Rousseas, on any given Sunday either of these two great vintages can come out on top (98).

There were two more 1993 Burgs sampled this week, beginning with a shut down 1993 Rouget Vosne Romanee Cros Parantoux. I wanted so much more out of this wine, but only got shy purple and aren’t you not experienced fruit. There was latent potential here but it just didn’t click on this night (91).

Put A Cork In It

The other ’93 was an impressive A. & F. Gros Richebourg. This was a big wine, powerful and rich, showing more fruit than your average 1993. There was percolating menthol to its black and purple personality, and a lot of spice to this behemoth. It got stronger with time (95).

Speaking of Gros, one of the best wines I had this busy week was a 1962 Gros-Renaudot Clos Vougeot. This was an incredible ’62, both delicious and lingering. It felt like it needed a sequel, I wanted more. Its fruit was so lush and creamy, it hit my wine spot and reminded me how age equals beauty when it comes to great wine (96).

Cros, Gros & Beze

A 1999 Roumier Bonnes Mares was another ballgame, delivering a game-winning hit. This was still young, hinting at its wealth, but it kept its wallet in its pocket. There were cascades of red, purple and black fruit but none on obvious display. It had flesh without being fleshy, and flavor without being fruity. Earth and cedar sprinted up and down its sidelines, trying to get in the game. I loved the wine, but it still felt way too soon (95).

We began with the Rhone, so let’s end with it. A 1995 Chateau Rayas Chateauneuf du Pape was a bit shut down, simpler than I expected, not the usual extrovert. It didn’t get better over a long evening, either. Hopefully this was just any given bottle or any given phase, it just wasn’t any giving wine on this night (92).

It was a busy week, indeed, although no Bordeaux, but The Mogul would take care of that rather quickly and in the finest of fashions…

In Vino Veritas,
JK

Dinner with Friend in Burgundy

Burgundy is a nice place to be. Food, wine, friendship, it really seems to all come together in Pinot harmony. It is even nicer when the friends at the dinner table are some of the great winemakers and representatives in all of Burgundy. They all brought their own wines, of course, and we brought a few others from both inside and outside the region, as we figured they could use a change of pace. We served the wines we brought blind, to add a bit of fun and test the experienced palates of our guests and their spouses.

There were a couple of whites, and neither was a Chardonnay. After some discussion, Sylvain, aka ‘The Scholar,’ deduced that this was a white from Didier Dageneau. Impressive! It was, indeed, a 2009 Dageneau Pouilly Fume Silex. This was full-bodied and heavy for a Sauvignon Blanc, reminding me of a Montrachet in its unique way. The flavors of the grape were not pungent or overstated in this big and classy white (93).

The next white was easily identifiable as a Riesling; it was a surprisingly good 1994 Fritz Haag Braunburger Juffer Riesling Spatlese. Why surprisingly? Well, it was 1994, a vintage I don’t remember meaning much, and it wasn’t destructively sweet. Time had mellowed its sugar. I love Riesling, but dry Riesling, so I tend to shy away from Spatleses and Ausleses, preferring the younger ‘GG’s aiming for a drier style. However, with age, the Spats and Ausleses start to dry. Perhaps twenty years for a Spat, and 30+ for an Aus? I don’t confess to know 100%, I should do an older Riesling tasting soon. Back to the wine, which had aromas of wool, sweet petrol and peach. Its palate was full with sweet flesh but a dry finish. There were nice flavors to this ‘still young’ wine (93).

On to the reds, where we enjoyed our first Burgundy, a 2007 La Forge du Tart. This is a premier cru wine, made from the younger vines (less than 25 years) of the Grand Cru Clos du Tart. Under the guide of Sylvain Pithiot, the storied and important vineyard of Clos du Tart has become a resurgent star in Burgundy, taking its rightful place amongst its elite Grand Crus. Anyone who has spoken to me about younger vintages in Burgundy will know that I am a big lover of 2007. The whites are top-notch, and while the reds may not be elite, they are extraordinarily delicious at a young age. There was a lot of structure here for an ’07, and its tight and big finish was a testament to its dirt. There was still an open quality to its fruit, and its full and long personality bristled with minerals. This was another shiningly good 2007 that rounded out well in the glass (92).

A New Tart

A 2002 Rousseau Clos de la Roche was a nice re-introduction to one of Rousseau’s forgotten Grand Crus. Some cereal and celery aromas weaved their way through its roasted nose. There was some classic Burgundy fruit on its palate, intense with its backside and bright with that signature 2002 acid, all in balance. 2002 remains the forgotten great vintage between 1999 and 2005. Thanks to Eric for reminding us all with his bottle (93).

2002s Singing

There was another 2002 thanks to Jean-Luc, a 2002 Vogue Bonnes Mares. There was a touch of game to its nose, along with cereal, wheat and honey. This was a big-boned, full-bodied and rich red, ‘intense and luscious.’ Its only flaw was a touch of squareness on its finish, but sometimes it’s hip to be square. Time would round things out, as well (94).

You Know Who

We were back to mystery territory, which happened to be the same terroir. This wine was clearly more mature, also gamy but similar with its wheaty nose. Eric found it ‘very elegant,’ and everyone was loving the extra age and resulting blossoming. This 1989 Drouhin Bonnes Mares was rich, creamy and long, but in the end, the Vogue surged past it ever so slightly (93).

A 2006 DRC La Tache made everyone stand up and take notice. This was a deep wine showing lots of skin, with that cedary goodness on top of fruit that smelled addictively good. There was almost a drug-like euphoria to the La Tache. This was a full and long wine, with a finish that was fine and polished despite lingering on and on. There was forest in the house, or this was a house made out of an entire forest, as its breadth and depth impressed us all. Spicy and sexy, La Tache is always special (96).

Queen Bee

We ended with a pair of ambassadors from some of those ‘other’ regions in France. Sylvain admired the first wine’s ‘Burgundy nose’ and continued ‘old yet fresh.’ There was a lot of chocolate to its creamy nose. The palate was rich and heavy but a touch clumsy. There were flavors of wheat, earth and mushrooms in this 1947 Rouget, a Pomerol. It had fairly nice acidity still for the hot vintage of 1947 (93).

The last wine on this beautiful night was a kinky 1991 Chateau de Fonsalette Cotes du Rhone, a wine made by Chateau Rayas that is Cotes du Rhone in name only and far from the usual $10-15 red. Its nose was full of sweet, red strawberry, Grenache fruit. Its palate was lush and honeyed, but it still felt young. This was absolutely delicious, and some cereal and wheat rounded out its palate, although some found it in the ‘brett’ direction, but not in a bad way (93+).

Dirty Birdie

In the end, the 2002s were still bottle strong and showing even better, just a small addendum to this wonderful evening. It will always be a good night when in Burgundy with friends.

In Vino Veritas,
JK

  • Sign Up
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.
×

Cart

Sign up for Acker exclusive offers, access to amazing wine events & world-class wine content!



    Please note there will be a credit card usage fee of two percent (2%) on the total auction purchase price up to the credit card payment limit of USD$15,000, HKD$150,000, or SGD$20,000 for live auctions, and on the total amount charged on internet auctions (except where prohibited by applicable law).